The Alabama Claims
![]() |
|
C.S.S. Alabama |
What
we like to call “the special
relationship” between the United States and
Great Britain, cemented by two world wars, was in short supply in the
1860`s. At the outbreak of the Civil War in 1861, the North declared a blockade
of Confederate harbours thereby
cutting off exports of cotton and causing great problems for the British textile
industries.
It
was against this background in November 1861 in international waters off Cuba,
that the Union warship San Jacinto, commanded by Captain Wilkes intercepted the
British mail steamer Trent. A boarding party seized two Confederate
commissioners, John Siddell and James Mason, en route to Britain and France.
Lord Palmerston, Britain`s foreign secretary demanded their release and war
clouds gathered between Britain and the United States for the second time in
less than thirty years. After intense diplomatic pressure, President Abraham
Lincoln reluctantly backed down and ordered the release of the two commissioners
commenting that one war at a time was enough! The immediate threat of foreign
intervention was thereby lifted.
Both
Union and Confederate governments expected the war would be over in a matter of
weeks. The South`s President Jefferson Davis
was convinced that cotton was the key and
knowing that the European powers would not
allow the newly announced blockade to starve them of that essential
staple, he encouraged the cotton growers to hold their crops off the market.
Commissioners from both North and South were sent to Europe, the South to try to
get Europe to intervene on its behalf and the North to thwart this. Jefferson
Davis was fortunate in having Stephen R Malloryas his Secretary of the Navy, a
very able appointee who, in a shrewd move, chose James Dunwoody Bulloch as his
chief purchasing agent in Europe.
Mallory had to take account of the South`s virtual lack of a navy in developing a strategy to counter the Northern blockade. He decided that what was needed was several fast wooden cruisers to strike, not at the blockading fleet, but at the North`s vast commercial fleet. He hoped this would divert warships from the blockade so weakening its effectiveness.
Bulloch
was given the task of procuring the necessary ships and with his experience of
shipping matters felt that
Liverpool with its vast shipyards was the perfect choice. Mallory warned him
that the task would not be easy. Queen Victoria`s Proclamation of Neutrality
recognized the parties as belligerents and limited the amount of help that could
be given to their ships in British ports. But this was not the only obstacle.
Mallory advised Bulloch to familiarize himself with Britain`s Foreign Enlistment
Act 1819. This Act stated , inter alia, that “No British subject shall engage
in equipping any vessel or ship, with the intent that such ship or vessel shall
be employed in the service of a belligerent.”
Bulloch
wasted no time in seeking legal advice from an eminent Liverpool solicitor Mr.
F.S. Hull, a choice which was to have far
reaching results. Mr. Hull briefed two leading barristers on the interpretation
of Section 7 of the Act. He framed his brief to the barristers to the effect
that Section 7 dealt with warships and he argued that to be a warship, a ship
had to have guns. However it would be legal to sell an unarmed vessel to a
belligerent regardless of its intended use. The two barristers concurred with
his interpretation.
Armed
with these opinions, Bulloch lost no time in placing his first ship order
in Liverpool with the yard of William C Miller & Sons. This was for a
screw gunboat called the Oreta.
Bulloch`s activities in Liverpool attracted the unwelcome attention of the newly
appointed US Consul Thomas Haines Dudley. Dudley employed a retired detective,
Matthew McGuire, to spy on the Confederate shipbuilding operations. Within days,
McGuire spotted the Oreta in Miller`s yard and was able to indentify her as a
gunboat possibly destined for the Confederacy. Dudley reported these facts to
Charles Francis Adams, the American Minister in London, who in turn, protested to Lord
John Russell the British Foreign Secretary, requesting that the ship be detained
under The Foreign Enlistment Act.
Lord
Russell undertook to look into the matter. He instructed The Collector of
Customs in Liverpool, Mr. S. Price Edwards to interview the owner William C Miller
and Price Edwards himself made arrangements for his officers to examine the
Oreto. Ostensibly, the ship was being built for an Italian firm in Palermo and
although she had all attributes of a
gunship, she carried no guns. A report of these enquiries was sent
to London by the Collector who advised that the ship could not be
detained as her builders had broken no law.
Bulloch,
realizing that he had had a narrow escape, lost no time in arranging for the
Oreta to sail and hired an English captain, James Angus
Duguid. who hired a crew for a voyage to Italy. To further conceal her true destination he arranged a party on board
with female guests hoping that this would suggest to the authorities that she
was going on a routine trial. On 22nd March 1862, the Oreta steamed
out of Liverpool. The steamer Bahama, chartered by Bulloch and carrying Oreta`s
guns sailed to meet her at Nassau in the Bahamas where she also took on her
Confederate commander, Captain John Newland Maffet. When she set sail again it
was as the commerce raider CSS Florida.
This
successful ruse was repeated by Bulloch in the case of his second order for a
screw gunboat placed with Laird`s of Birkenhead. This vessel was known as No290,
ie. the 290th ship built by the yard. Dudley,
had identified the 290 in Laird`s yard and reported that he believed she
was a gunboat intended for the
Confederates. Once again, Adams complained to Lord Russell
who showed no more interest than he had done in the case of the Oreta.
Finally,
Adams took legal advice from Robert Collier QC who confirmed that
Britain would lay itself open to substantial redress unless the 290 was
seized. Bulloch received warning of this and as with the Oreta
he arranged for the 290 to go to sea. This time the rendezvous was with
the steamer Agrippina in the Azores. Fully armed and with her
new captain Raphael Semmes
at the helm, the CSS Alabama as she
was now known, proceeded on a two year guerre
de course around the world. She sank or bonded so many ships that she became a
major factor in crippling the American Merchant
Marine.
The CSS Alabama was finally brought to book off Cherbourg by Captain John A Winslow of the USS Kearsarge. Following a two hour battle the CSS Alabama sank. Captain Semmes and some of his officers were rescued by the British yacht Deerhound and were landed in the UK.
After
the end of the Civil War, Adams made several attempts to claim reparations from
Britain for the damage inflicted on Northern shipping by the CSS Alabama and
other Confederate cruisers which had been built, fitted out and otherwise aided
by British interests. The Prime Minister Lord Palmerston, dismissed the claims
out of hand and it wasn't until 1871 that the
US Secretary of State, Hamilton Fish, brought about The Treaty of Washington
which provided for arbitration
between the two governments.
The
object of the parties in agreeing the Treaty was to deal with all outstanding
disputes under one umbrella, generically called The Alabama Claims. The Treaty
provided for a panel of five arbiters representing Britain, America, the King of
Italy, the President of the Swiss Federation and the Emperor of Brazil. It set
out three rules which were to codify the obligations of neutrality which America
regarded as international law, but Britain
disagreed. The parties instructed the tribunal to apply these rules as a lex
specialis.
The three rules were:
1. That a neutral government is bound to use due diligence to prevent the fitting out, the arming or equipping, or the departure of any vessel from within its jurisdiction, which it has reasonable grounds to believe is intended to cruise or carry on war against a power with which it is at peace.
2. That a neutral government is bound not to permit or suffer any belligerent to use its ports or waters as a base for naval operations or to allow supplies or repairs to be carried out therein.
3.
That a neutral government is bound to exercise due diligence in its own
ports or waters and as to all persons within its jurisdiction to prevent any
violation of the foregoing obligations and duties .
The
Tribunal met in Geneva and the cases of the two parties
were exchanged. At the first hurdle, the Treaty seemed doomed. The
American case revived the indirect , constructive, consequential and national
claims, originally put forward by Charles Sumner a senior senator from
Massachusetts. Chief Justice
Cockburn, Counsel for Great Britain, argued that the Treaty entirely waived
indirect claims, whether by grammar, by reason , by policy, or by any other
standard. Charles F Adams the American representative finally persuaded his
colleagues on the Tribunal to drop the indirect claims.
With
this obstacle removed and after considerable argument on the differing
interpretations of the legal definitions of
“due diligence”, the panel delivered its award. They were unanimous
in finding that Great Britain was liable for the depredations committed by the
CSS Alabama. In the case of the CSS Florida, the Tribunal found in favor of
America by a majority of 4 to 1, and by a majority of 3 to 2 they found that the
CSS Shenandoah should have been detained at Melbourne where she had recruited
and coaled.
The
damages awarded in full and final settlement of all claims amounted to £3,25000
against the American claim for £9,5000.
As there was some difficulty in distributing the money to those who had
any real right to the compensation, the American Treasury benefited
from the damages.
The
other disputes between the parties , eg. fishing rights, the legal status of
naturalizations and the treatment of Fenians, were all dealt with in the Treaty.
It was not until 1872, with Emperor William I of Germany acting as arbitrator,
that the San Juan boundary dispute was decided.
The
CSS Alabama and her captain Raphael Semmes continued to stir passions long after
the Civil War had ended. During the First World War, Kaiser William ordered his
Admirals to study the book written by Semmes entitled “My Adventures Afloat in
the Sumpter and the
Alabama.” No doubt in turn, they influenced their U-Boat commanders. It was
only after World War One that the U.S. Merchant Marine started to recover from
the damage caused by the Confederate raiders. As insurance rates went sky high,
American merchant ships transferred
their legal ownership to neutral nations and flags of convenience.
In
1984 the French Navy minesweeper
Circe, commanded by Bruno Duclos discovered the wreck of the CSS Alabama on the
seabed seven nautical miles off Cherbourg. Five years later in 1989, France and
the US signed a pact agreeing that the
US owned the ship, but the French retained custody. Even after this remove in
time, despite having built the ship, Britain was not given any say in its
disposal, which might have allowed some artifacts or even the wreck itself to be
brought home.
Further suggested reading:
The Alabama Arbitration by T.W. Balch.
Argument at Geneva ( printed by the US government).
Pitt Cobbetts Leading cases in International Law volume II.
The Confederate Navy by Philip Van Doren Stern.
The Confederate Navy in Europe by Warren F Spencer.
The Rebel Raiders by James Tertius DeKay.
| Douglas W. Stewart resides in Great Britain. He is a retired Company Lawyer (Barrister at Law). Prior to reading for the Bar he spent 18 years in HM Customs & Excise, latterly as a Senior Officer (HEO) in the Investigation Division. |